The Corridors Race — Gulf States and Ankara Bypass Hormuz
News: In their most strategically significant response since the war began, major Gulf states — led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE — alongside Turkey as a pivotal regional power, are accelerating the development of a…

News: In their most strategically significant response since the war began, major Gulf states — led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE — alongside Turkey as a pivotal regional power, are accelerating the development of a network of alternative trade and energy corridors that bypass the Strait of Hormuz entirely. The push spans extended pipeline systems, overland rail networks, and integrated logistics corridors. The message is unambiguous: Hormuz will not remain Tehran’s hostage forever.
US Significance: This shift serves Washington’s interests directly. The more Hormuz loses its centrality, the more Iran loses its ability to hold the global economy hostage through energy leverage — and the lower the American military price tag for managing Gulf crises. But the equation has not yet changed: alternative infrastructure remains under construction, and Washington is still compelled to guarantee the strait’s security on its own.
Consequences: The numbers expose the real predicament. The strait carries 20 million barrels per day, while all existing alternatives combined absorb only 20–30% of that volume. The UAE’s Habshan-Fujairah pipeline tops out at 1.8 million barrels, and Aramco’s East-West Pipeline reaches no more than 3 million barrels under wartime conditions — both falling far short of replacing Hormuz. Most critically, the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline — linking Iraq to Turkey’s Mediterranean coast and a cornerstone of this alternative network — faces the expiration of its operating agreement in July 2026, amid thorny Turkish-Iraqi negotiations that could shut it down at the worst possible moment.
Scenarios:
- Gradual Shift: Investment accelerates with joint US-Gulf backing, and the corridors successfully absorb a larger share of energy flows by end of 2027, progressively eroding Iran’s leverage card.
- Structural Stalemate: Projects stall under the weight of enormous costs and security complexities, leaving Hormuz without a viable substitute — and leaving Iran in possession of the global economy’s master key.
- New Regional Friction: Competition over alternative routes generates dangerous tensions between Ankara, Baghdad, and Abu Dhabi, adding a fresh crisis layer on top of the existing war.
More in Gulf States
See all →Mali | Moscow’s Gamble Unravels
The News: On April 25, 2026, an alliance of the Azawad Liberation Front and Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin launched the largest coordinated attack in Mali’s conflict history since 2012, simultaneously striking…
UAE Withdraws from OPEC and OPEC+
The News: The United Arab Emirates announced through its state news agency WAM its formal withdrawal from OPEC and the OPEC+ alliance, effective May 1, 2026. The announcement came on the same day OPEC was preparing to…
A Unified International Position: Condemning Israel’s Diplomatic Representation in “Somaliland”
The News The foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the Federal Republic of Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Bangladesh, Algeria, Palestine, Turkey, and Indonesia issued a joint statement strongly condemning Israel’s…
United States & Iran — Blockade of the Strait of Hormuz
The Islamabad Talks and Their CollapseWhat Happened? Weekend talks in Islamabad between Washington and Tehran ended without a deal. A source close to the negotiations said the two sides came “very close” to an agreement…



